Abstract
After a great deal of consideration and analysis, this research deals with subordinate clause and it's structural indication effect in violating grammatical rules in both chapters ( Ali Imran and An-nisa). This is because the former studies focused most on the role of the subordinate clause in understanding lingual denotations in terms of rhetoric. Therefore, this study is going to clarify the role of the subordinate clause in understanding grammatical indications. It is a detailed study that aims at clarify the role of the subordinate clause in violating grammatical rules in terms of expansion of understanding of lingual meanings and then analyze them in these two chapters.
Since this study requires several methods, I haveadopted descriptive and statistical methods and that is through defining subordinate clause and then knowing how many times occurs in these two chapters with analysis of it.
The study has reached several findings of which the most important are:
Most violation of subordinate clause of grammatical rules through proceeding nouns is in chapter (Ali Imran). (SUBJECT) is proceeded by (PREDICATE) in three places: One in An-nisa and the two others in Ali Imran. Most violation of subordinate clause of grammatical rules regarding verbs was in An-nisa in which Subject of the word Laysah (NOT) is proceeded by it's predicate in one place in chapter Ali Imran whereas Subject of the word Laysah (NOT) is proceeded by it's predicate in two places in chapter An-nisa. The study has been concluded by the most prominent findings with a list of references.
Prelude: subordinate, violation, proceed and delete.